top of page
Search

A Structural Shift in Professional Degree Policy: Why Chiropractic Feels the Adjustment and Why the Profession Should Pay Attention

  • Writer: Jesse D. (JD) Greening
    Jesse D. (JD) Greening
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • 4 min read
ree

Over the past week, a proposed Department of Education policy started circulating across social media, a widely discussed update that may modify how federal regulations define “professional degree” programs. For most people, it appeared as a Shade Room headline.


For anyone in healthcare, especially students carrying six-figure loans, it landed like a grenade.



Here is the gist: According to several news reports and statements from stakeholder organizations, the DOE’s draft framework for updated student-loan categories would assign higher borrowing caps to a narrow group of “professional degree” programs. These reports state that degrees such as medicine, dentistry, law, pharmacy, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, and chiropractic appear on this list.


At the same time, multiple health-professional associations report that graduate nursing (MSN, DNP), nurse practitioner programs, physical therapy, audiology, and physician assistant programs do not appear to be included under this proposed classification.


Because this information is based on a draft proposal and stakeholder interpretation, the implications are still unfolding. But the reaction across healthcare has been immediate, emotional, and deeply divided.


Let’s break down the win and the warning.


The Win: Why Chiropractors Should Care (and Maybe Celebrate)


1. Federal Recognition May Increase Perceived Legitimacy

For decades, chiropractic has worked to establish its standing within federal policy frameworks. If chiropractic is ultimately included in the DOE’s final “professional degree” definition, as reported, that placement aligns the DC degree with long-established professional doctorates.


This kind of classification, if adopted, signals to policymakers:“This is a doctoral-level profession with advanced training and public responsibility.”


Even the possibility of inclusion enhances the conversation around chiropractic’s status.


2. Potential Access to Higher Federal Borrowing Caps

Under the proposal, “professional degree” programs would qualify for higher annual and lifetime loan limits. If chiropractic remains in that category when the rules are finalized, future DC students could gain more stable and predictable financing, reducing reliance on high-interest private loans.


This would support student recruitment, retention, and program sustainability.


3. A Competitive Advantage in Graduate Healthcare Education

Students compare program cost, loan structure, and perceived federal recognition. If PT, PA, and graduate nursing programs remain outside the professional-degree designation, chiropractic may become more financially appealing to applicants deciding between conservative-care or musculoskeletal fields.


4. Stronger Ground in Policy Discussions

A federal classification that aligns chiropractic with legacy professional doctorates strengthens the profession’s positioning in discussions involving:

  • reimbursement

  • access to care

  • professional status

  • conservative spine care

  • health workforce development


While nothing is final yet, the conversation has clearly shifted.

The Warning: Why This Move Could Hurt Healthcare as a Whole

A policy shift like this does not happen in isolation. And while chiropractic may benefit, the rest of the healthcare system may experience unintended consequences, especially if financing opportunities for other fields decrease.


1. Nursing and NP Workforce Bottlenecks

Nursing organizations argue that excluding nursing programs from the professional-degree category risks reducing access to graduate-level nursing education. If students face new loan limitations, this could contribute to:

  • longer emergency department wait times

  • worsening primary care shortages

  • higher burnout among existing clinicians

  • decreased access in many communities


These concerns come directly from nursing associations responding to the DOE proposal.


2. PT and PA Pipeline Challenges

Physical therapy and physician assistant programs are core components of musculoskeletal and rehabilitative care. If loan structures make these programs harder to enter or afford, the conservative-care ecosystem could weaken, which ultimately affects chiropractic as well.


A healthy system requires all conservative-care professions to remain strong.


3. Potential Widening of Healthcare Inequities

Programs flagged as excluded by stakeholder groups often enroll large numbers of first-generation students, working-class individuals, women, and racial and ethnic minorities.


Limiting financing access could widen inequities and reduce diversity in healthcare leadership and practice.


4. Increased Likelihood of Scope Conflicts

Whenever one group gains perceived elevation and others feel devalued, tension rises. This may trigger:

  • scope-of-practice battles

  • reimbursement conflicts

  • legislative disputes

  • interprofessional friction


Chiropractic must be mindful of how this shift is perceived across healthcare.

The Truth: Chiropractors Should Celebrate but Stay Smart

If chiropractic is included in the final DOE rules, it represents a meaningful milestone for the profession. It reflects growth, credibility, and visibility within federal classification systems.


But it is equally important to recognize the broader context.

Healthcare is a team sport. We do not thrive without PTs, NPs, nurses, PAs, audiologists, and other allied providers, especially in the many settings where coordinated care is essential.


Our profession may benefit from this proposed change, but the healthcare system struggles if others are left behind.


Chiropractic must rise responsibly and maintain a collaborative mindset as this policy evolves.


The Call to Action

For chiropractors and chiropractic students:

  • Use this as recognition. The fact that chiropractic is even discussed within this classification is meaningful.

  • Do not weaponize it. Elevating chiropractic should not come at the expense of other professions.

  • Strengthen inter-professional relationships. The future of healthcare depends on teamwork.

  • Stay engaged in policy. Proposals like this are shaped by advocacy, presence, and informed dialogue.

  • Show up professionally. Recognition brings responsibility.


Handled well, this moment positions chiropractic not only to be seen, but to lead responsibly within an evolving healthcare system.


Sources
These sources directly report the points summarized in this article:
 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Stay Connected

Join our community for updates

The Adjusted Perspective.

 

© 2035 by The Adjusted Perspective. Powered and secured by Wix

 

bottom of page